Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesHam And Petersham Ward - Historic [HPW] wardTW10 7QP49 Stuart Road, Richmond, Surrey96/3820
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

96/3820.

49 Stuart Road, Richmond, Surrey

Full / Other Planning at 49 Stuart Road, Richmond, Surrey, received 14 Nov 1996 — approved on 11 Dec 1996 (delegated, Unknown - Historic (Expired)).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
11 Dec 1996
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
3
Documents
3 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection Of Single Storey Side Extension

Reference
96/3820
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Postcode
Received
14 Nov 1996
Target date
9 Jan 1997
Decision date
11 Dec 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Reference
96/3820
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Postcode
Received
14 Nov 1996
Target date
9 Jan 1997
Decision date
11 Dec 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE
10 Dec 2010
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019
DECISION NOTICE
10 Dec 2010
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019
Historic Data - Drawing
10 Jan 2019

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 11 Dec 1996, delegated decision by Unknown - Historic (Expired) — 4 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Nov 1996
Application received
9 Jan 1997
Statutory target date
11 Dec 1996
Delegated decision: Approved · Unknown - Historic (Expired)
14 Nov 1996
Application received
9 Jan 1997
Statutory target date
11 Dec 1996
Delegated decision: Approved · Unknown - Historic (Expired)

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.