Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesHeathfield Ward [HTF] wardPA26/0908
Planning application · Richmond Upon Thames

PA26/0908.

105 Ellerman Avenue Twickenham

Householder at 105 Ellerman Avenue Twickenham, received 16 Mar 2026 — approved on 12 May 2026 (delegated, Georgia Nicol).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationRichmond Upon Thames profile →
Approved
Outcome
12 May 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
8
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Richmond Upon Thames planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Ground floor rear and side extension incorporating a flat roof. Replacement of g

Reference
PA26/0908
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Not recorded
Case officer
Received
16 Mar 2026
Validated
17 Mar 2026
Target date
11 May 2026
Decision date
12 May 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Reference
PA26/0908
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Case officer
Received
16 Mar 2026
Validated
17 Mar 2026
Target date
11 May 2026
Decision date
12 May 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Richmond Upon Thames portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 12 May 2026, delegated decision by Georgia Nicol — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
16 Mar 2026
Application received
17 Mar 2026
Application validated
11 May 2026
Statutory target date
12 May 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Georgia Nicol
16 Mar 2026
Application received
17 Mar 2026
Application validated
11 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
12 May 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Georgia Nicol

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.