Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSouthwarkWard Name Superceded Or Address Outside ward00/AP/0902
Planning application · Southwark

00/AP/0902.

Vinopolis City Of Wine 1 Bank End SE1

Full / Other Planning at Vinopolis City Of Wine 1 Bank End SE1, received 8 May 2000 — refused on 26 Jul 2002 (delegated, Historic Officer).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationSouthwark profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Jul 2002
116 wks
Decision time
108 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Southwark planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of flue and installation of new kitchen extract duct beneath and at side of railway arch on Clink St

Reference
00/AP/0902
Type
Minor application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
8 May 2000
Validated
7 Jun 2000
Target date
1 Aug 2000
Decision date
26 Jul 2002
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
00/AP/0902
Type
Minor application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
8 May 2000
Validated
7 Jun 2000
Target date
1 Aug 2000
Decision date
26 Jul 2002
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Southwark portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Jul 2002, delegated decision by Historic Officer — 116 weeks from submission (108 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
8 May 2000
Application received
7 Jun 2000
Application validated
1 Aug 2000
Statutory target date
26 Jul 2002
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer
8 May 2000
Application received
7 Jun 2000
Application validated
1 Aug 2000
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Jul 2002
Delegated decision: Refused · Historic Officer

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.