Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Southwark›…Goose Green wardSE22 8HU127 Lordship Lane London SE22 8HU›08/AP/0392
Planning application · Southwark

08/AP/0392.

127 Lordship Lane London SE22 8HU

Full / Other Planning at 127 Lordship Lane London SE22 8HU, received 14 Feb 2008 — refused on 18 Apr 2008.

Southwark›Goose Green›SE22 8HU›08/AP/0392
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSouthwark profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Apr 2008
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Southwark planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Ground and first floor rear extension to create additional commercial floorspace to existing restaurant.

Reference
08/AP/0392
Type
Minor application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
14 Feb 2008
Validated
26 Feb 2008
Decision date
18 Apr 2008
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
08/AP/0392
Type
Minor application
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
14 Feb 2008
Validated
26 Feb 2008
Decision date
18 Apr 2008
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Southwark portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 18 Apr 2008 — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Feb 2008
Application received
26 Feb 2008
Application validated
18 Apr 2008
Delegated decision: Refused
14 Feb 2008
Application received
26 Feb 2008
Application validated
18 Apr 2008
Delegated decision: Refused

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.