Planning application · Southwark
22/AP/1032.
15 Colnbrook Street London Southwark SE1 6EZ
Listed Building at 15 Colnbrook Street London Southwark SE1 6EZ, received 14 Mar 2022 — refused on 24 Jun 2022 by committee.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSouthwark profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Jun 2022
15 wks
Decision time
7 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
30
Documents
30 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Southwark planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of extension on rear outrigger, restoration of front facade and removal of chimney breast at lower ground floor
Reference
22/AP/1032
Type
Listed Building Consent
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE1 6EZ
Ward
Council
Received
14 Mar 2022
Validated
18 Mar 2022
Target date
12 May 2022
Decision date
24 Jun 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
22/AP/1032
Type
Listed Building Consent
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE1 6EZ
Ward
Council
Received
14 Mar 2022
Validated
18 Mar 2022
Target date
12 May 2022
Decision date
24 Jun 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Southwark portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 24 Jun 2022, determined by the planning committee — 15 weeks from submission (7 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
14 Mar 2022
Application received
18 Mar 2022
Application validated
12 May 2022
Statutory target date
24 Jun 2022
Committee decision: Refused
14 Mar 2022
Application received
18 Mar 2022
Application validated
12 May 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
24 Jun 2022
Committee decision: Refused
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extension, due to excessive scale and the disruptive window
design on the rear elevation, would cause harm to the significance of the
listed building, the setting of the Grade II listed building no.16 Colnbrook
Street and wider Grade II listed terrace 2-18 Colnbrook Street. The
proposed removal of historic fabric would further cause harm due to the
loss of plan form causing harm to the significance of the grade II listed
building.
The proposed works are therefore contrary to P19 - Listed Buildings and
Structures and P20 - Conservation Areas of the Southwark Plan 2022,
Heritage SPD (2021), Policy HC1 - Heritage conservation and growth of
the London Plan 2021, Chapter 16 Conserving and enhancing the historic
environment of the NPPF 2021, and the Planning (Listed Buildings and
Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
1
The proposed extension, due to excessive scale and the disruptive window
design on the rear elevation, would cause harm to the significance of the
listed building, the setting of the Grade II listed building no.16 Colnbrook
Street and wider Grade II listed terrace 2-18 Colnbrook Street. The
proposed removal of historic fabric would further cause harm due to the
loss of plan form causing harm to the significance of the grade II listed
building.
The proposed works are therefore contrary to P19 - Listed Buildings and
Structures and P20 - Conservation Areas of the Southwark Plan 2022,
Heritage SPD (2021), Policy HC1 - Heritage conservation and growth of
the London Plan 2021, Chapter 16 Conserving and enhancing the historic
environment of the NPPF 2021, and the Planning (Listed Buildings and
Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
Policies cited
NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.