Planning application · Southwark
23/AP/0308.
11 Tisdall Place London Southwark SE17 1QQ
Householder at 11 Tisdall Place London Southwark SE17 1QQ, received 6 Feb 2023 — refused on 30 May 2023 by committee.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSouthwark profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 May 2023
16 wks
Decision time
8 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
30
Documents
30 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Southwark planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of existing single storey rear extension and construction of a part 1 storey and part 2 storey rear extension
Reference
23/AP/0308
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE17 1QQ
Ward
Council
Received
6 Feb 2023
Validated
4 Apr 2023
Target date
29 May 2023
Decision date
30 May 2023
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
23/AP/0308
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE17 1QQ
Ward
Council
Received
6 Feb 2023
Validated
4 Apr 2023
Target date
29 May 2023
Decision date
30 May 2023
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Southwark portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 30 May 2023, determined by the planning committee — 16 weeks from submission (8 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
6 Feb 2023
Application received
4 Apr 2023
Application validated
29 May 2023
Statutory target date
30 May 2023
Committee decision: Refused
6 Feb 2023
Application received
4 Apr 2023
Application validated
29 May 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
30 May 2023
Committee decision: Refused
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
By reason of its height, the proposed ground floor extension would be
overly dominant and would fail to appear subservient to the host building,
to the detriment of its character and appearance and would fail to preserve
or enhance The Mission Conservation Area. This is contrary to the P13
Design of places, P20 Conservation areas of the Southwark Plan (2022);
policies D3 Optimising site capacity through a design-led approach and
HC1 Heritage conservation and growth of the London Plan (2021); and
Chapter 16 Conserving and enhancing the historic environment of the
NPPF (2021); the Heritage SPD 2021; The Mission Conservation Area
Appraisal; and the guidance in the 2015 Technical Update to the
Residential Design Standards (2011).
2
By reason of the height and depth of the ground floor rear addition on the
boundary with No.13 Tisdall Place, the proposal would increase the
sense of enclosure at the rear of No. 13 to a harmful degree and would
result in an unacceptable impact on the daylight and outlook enjoyed by
this property. The loss of amenity at No. 13 would be considered contrary
to the NPPF (2021); policy P56 'Protection of amenity' of the Southwark
Plan (2022) and the guidance in the 2015 Technical Update to the
Residential Design Standards (2011).
1
By reason of its height, the proposed ground floor extension would be
overly dominant and would fail to appear subservient to the host building,
to the detriment of its character and appearance and would fail to preserve
or enhance The Mission Conservation Area. This is contrary to the P13
Design of places, P20 Conservation areas of the Southwark Plan (2022);
policies D3 Optimising site capacity through a design-led approach and
HC1 Heritage conservation and growth of the London Plan (2021); and
Chapter 16 Conserving and enhancing the historic environment of the
NPPF (2021); the Heritage SPD 2021; The Mission Conservation Area
Appraisal; and the guidance in the 2015 Technical Update to the
Residential Design Standards (2011).
2
By reason of the height and depth of the ground floor rear addition on the
boundary with No.13 Tisdall Place, the proposal would increase the
sense of enclosure at the rear of No. 13 to a harmful degree and would
result in an unacceptable impact on the daylight and outlook enjoyed by
this property. The loss of amenity at No. 13 would be considered contrary
to the NPPF (2021); policy P56 'Protection of amenity' of the Southwark
Plan (2022) and the guidance in the 2015 Technical Update to the
Residential Design Standards (2011).
Policies cited
NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.