Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Southwark›…Ward Name Superceded Or Address Outside ward›99/AP/1144
Planning application · Southwark

99/AP/1144.

Vinopolis Clink Street/Stoney Street SE1

Advertisement at Vinopolis Clink Street/Stoney Street SE1, received 26 Jul 1999 — approved on 9 Aug 2001 (delegated, Historic Officer).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationSouthwark profile →
Approved
Outcome
9 Aug 2001
106 wks
Decision time
98 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Southwark planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Display of illuminated venue sign and menu box (below railway bridge).

Reference
99/AP/1144
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jul 1999
Target date
19 Sep 1999
Decision date
9 Aug 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Granted
Council register
Reference
99/AP/1144
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jul 1999
Target date
19 Sep 1999
Decision date
9 Aug 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Granted
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE
9 Aug 2001
DECISION NOTICE
9 Aug 2001

Documents open on the Southwark portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 9 Aug 2001, delegated decision by Historic Officer — 106 weeks from submission (98 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Jul 1999
Application received
19 Sep 1999
Statutory target date
9 Aug 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Historic Officer
26 Jul 1999
Application received
19 Sep 1999
Statutory target date
9 Aug 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Historic Officer

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.