Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…Cheam ward›A2016/75471
Planning application · Sutton

A2016/75471.

62 Church Hill Road North Cheam SM3 8LJ

Householder at 62 Church Hill Road North Cheam SM3 8LJ, received 23 Sep 2016 — refused on 24 Oct 2016 (delegated, LBS DM Historic Officer).

Sutton›Cheam›SM3 8LJ›A2016/75471
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Oct 2016
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension projecting from the rear of the original house by 4.0m

Reference
A2016/75471
Type
PA Householder Rear Extension
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM3 8LJ
Ward
Council
Received
23 Sep 2016
Decision date
24 Oct 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Reference
A2016/75471
Type
PA Householder Rear Extension
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM3 8LJ
Ward
Council
Received
23 Sep 2016
Decision date
24 Oct 2016
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Oct 2016, delegated decision by LBS DM Historic Officer — 4 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Sep 2016
Application received
24 Oct 2016
Delegated decision: Refused · LBS DM Historic Officer
23 Sep 2016
Application received
24 Oct 2016
Delegated decision: Refused · LBS DM Historic Officer

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.