Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…Nonsuch wardKT4 8ST223 Cheam Common Road Worcester Park KT4 8ST›A2017/78614
Planning application · Sutton

A2017/78614.

223 Cheam Common Road Worcester Park KT4 8ST

Householder at 223 Cheam Common Road Worcester Park KT4 8ST, received 18 Dec 2017 — approved on 29 Jan 2018 (delegated, Ivona Bryant).

Sutton›Nonsuch›KT4 8ST›A2017/78614
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
29 Jan 2018
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of single storey side/rear extension.

Reference
A2017/78614
Type
Householder Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
18 Dec 2017
Decision date
29 Jan 2018
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Reference
A2017/78614
Type
Householder Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
18 Dec 2017
Decision date
29 Jan 2018
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Officer Report
29 Jan 2018
DECISION NOTICE
29 Jan 2018
Application Form
5 Jan 2018
Drawing
5 Jan 2018
Officer Report
29 Jan 2018
DECISION NOTICE
29 Jan 2018
Application Form
5 Jan 2018
Show all 4 rows
Drawing
5 Jan 2018

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 29 Jan 2018, delegated decision by Ivona Bryant — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Dec 2017
Application received
29 Jan 2018
Delegated decision: Approved · Ivona Bryant
18 Dec 2017
Application received
29 Jan 2018
Delegated decision: Approved · Ivona Bryant

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.