Planning application · Sutton
B1999/44074.
Householder at 13 Cudham Close, Sutton,, received 22 Jan 1999 — approved on 2 Mar 1999 (delegated, LBS DM Historic Officer).
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
2 Mar 1999
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a conservatory at rear.
Reference
B1999/44074
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
22 Jan 1999
Validated
29 Jan 1999
Decision date
2 Mar 1999
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Reference
B1999/44074
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
22 Jan 1999
Validated
29 Jan 1999
Decision date
2 Mar 1999
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 2 Mar 1999, delegated decision by LBS DM Historic Officer — 6 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
22 Jan 1999
Application received
29 Jan 1999
Application validated
2 Mar 1999
Delegated decision: Approved · LBS DM Historic Officer
22 Jan 1999
Application received
29 Jan 1999
Application validated
2 Mar 1999
Delegated decision: Approved · LBS DM Historic Officer
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.