Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonSutton South wardSM2 6PWThe Firs 23 Worcester Road Sutton SM2 6PWB2012/65974
Planning application · Sutton

B2012/65974.

The Firs 23 Worcester Road Sutton SM2 6PW

Non-Material Amendment at The Firs 23 Worcester Road Sutton SM2 6PW, received 22 May 2012 — refused on 19 Jun 2012 (delegated, Jody Williams).

SuttonSutton SouthSM2 6PWB2012/65974
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
19 Jun 2012
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Non material amendment to planning permission B2011/63834/FUL for erection of 8 x 2 bedroom homes together with associated car parking, landscaping and refuse and cycle storage for proposed houses and existing flats. External repair and upgrading to elevations of existing flats at The Firs, 23 Worcester Road, Sutton.

Reference
B2012/65974
Type
Non-Material Amendment
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
22 May 2012
Decision date
19 Jun 2012
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
B2012/65974
Type
Non-Material Amendment
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
22 May 2012
Decision date
19 Jun 2012
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 19 Jun 2012, delegated decision by Jody Williams — 4 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
22 May 2012
Application received
19 Jun 2012
Delegated decision: Refused · Jody Williams
22 May 2012
Application received
19 Jun 2012
Delegated decision: Refused · Jody Williams

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.