Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…Sutton West wardSM1 2JD›B2013/1098
Planning application · Sutton

B2013/1098.

78 Hilldale Road Cheam SM1 2JD

Discharge of Conditions at 78 Hilldale Road Cheam SM1 2JD, received 2 Sep 2013 — approved on 5 Feb 2014 (delegated, Jody Williams).

Sutton›Sutton West›SM1 2JD›B2013/1098
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
5 Feb 2014
22 wks
Decision time
14 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

APPLICATION TO CLEAR CONDITIONS FOR APPLICATION NUMBER B2013/66867 CONDITIONS 2,3,11,and 13.

Reference
B2013/1098
Type
Condition Clearing
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
2 Sep 2013
Validated
3 Sep 2013
Decision date
5 Feb 2014
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Council register
Reference
B2013/1098
Type
Condition Clearing
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
2 Sep 2013
Validated
3 Sep 2013
Decision date
5 Feb 2014
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 5 Feb 2014, delegated decision by Jody Williams — 22 weeks from submission (14 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Sep 2013
Application received
3 Sep 2013
Application validated
5 Feb 2014
Delegated decision: Approved · Jody Williams
2 Sep 2013
Application received
3 Sep 2013
Application validated
5 Feb 2014
Delegated decision: Approved · Jody Williams

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.