Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…Belmont wardSM2 6BQDelacy Court 34 Queens Road Belmont SM2 6BQ›B2014/0130
Planning application · Sutton

B2014/0130.

Delacy Court 34 Queens Road Belmont SM2 6BQ

Trees at Delacy Court 34 Queens Road Belmont SM2 6BQ, received 29 Sep 2014 — approved on 18 Nov 2014 (delegated, Maggie Wright).

Sutton›Belmont›SM2 6BQ›B2014/0130
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
18 Nov 2014
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Various tree works to TPO 2001/09 to include four trees to be felled (Maple and Cherry).

Reference
B2014/0130
Type
Fell a Preserved Tree
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Sep 2014
Validated
30 Sep 2014
Decision date
18 Nov 2014
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Reference
B2014/0130
Type
Fell a Preserved Tree
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Sep 2014
Validated
30 Sep 2014
Decision date
18 Nov 2014
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 18 Nov 2014, delegated decision by Maggie Wright — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Sep 2014
Application received
30 Sep 2014
Application validated
18 Nov 2014
Delegated decision: Approved · Maggie Wright
29 Sep 2014
Application received
30 Sep 2014
Application validated
18 Nov 2014
Delegated decision: Approved · Maggie Wright

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.