Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…Sutton South wardSM2 5DADental Surgery 1 Cedar Road Sutton SM2 5DA›B2017/76837
Planning application · Sutton

B2017/76837.

Dental Surgery 1 Cedar Road Sutton SM2 5DA

Advertisement at Dental Surgery 1 Cedar Road Sutton SM2 5DA, received 5 Apr 2017 — refused on 30 May 2017 (delegated, Andrew Thornley).

Sutton›Sutton South›SM2 5DA›B2017/76837
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 May 2017
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Display of free standing, double sided, internally illuminated monolith sign.

Reference
B2017/76837
Type
Advert Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
5 Apr 2017
Target date
9 May 2017
Decision date
30 May 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
B2017/76837
Type
Advert Application
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
5 Apr 2017
Target date
9 May 2017
Decision date
30 May 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 30 May 2017, delegated decision by Andrew Thornley — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Apr 2017
Application received
9 May 2017
Statutory target date
30 May 2017
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Thornley
5 Apr 2017
Application received
9 May 2017
Statutory target date
30 May 2017
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Thornley

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.