Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…Wandle Valley wardSM5 1EL1 Osney Walk Carshalton Surrey SM5 1EL›C2009/62070
Planning application · Sutton

C2009/62070.

1 Osney Walk Carshalton Surrey SM5 1EL

Other at 1 Osney Walk Carshalton Surrey SM5 1EL, received 1 Dec 2009 — approved on 22 Jan 2010 (delegated, Jody Williams).

Sutton›Wandle Valley›SM5 1EL›C2009/62070
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
22 Jan 2010
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retrospective application for the erection of a single storey rear extension to provide replacement bathroom.

Reference
C2009/62070
Type
Council Owned Regulation 3
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
1 Dec 2009
Decision date
22 Jan 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Reference
C2009/62070
Type
Council Owned Regulation 3
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
1 Dec 2009
Decision date
22 Jan 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 22 Jan 2010, delegated decision by Jody Williams — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Dec 2009
Application received
22 Jan 2010
Delegated decision: Approved · Jody Williams
1 Dec 2009
Application received
22 Jan 2010
Delegated decision: Approved · Jody Williams

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.