Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…Wandle Valley ward›C2012/65485
Planning application · Sutton

C2012/65485.

55 Pipewell Road Carshalton Surrey SM5 1EY

Other at 55 Pipewell Road Carshalton Surrey SM5 1EY, received 2 Feb 2012 — approved on 21 Sep 2012 (delegated, LBS DM Historic Officer).

Sutton›Wandle Valley›SM5 1EY›C2012/65485
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
21 Sep 2012
33 wks
Decision time
25 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of a single storey rear extension to provide replacement bathroom.

Reference
C2012/65485
Type
Council Owned Regulation 3
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 1EY
Ward
Council
Received
2 Feb 2012
Decision date
21 Sep 2012
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Council register
Reference
C2012/65485
Type
Council Owned Regulation 3
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 1EY
Ward
Council
Received
2 Feb 2012
Decision date
21 Sep 2012
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 21 Sep 2012, delegated decision by LBS DM Historic Officer — 33 weeks from submission (25 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Feb 2012
Application received
21 Sep 2012
Delegated decision: Approved · LBS DM Historic Officer
2 Feb 2012
Application received
21 Sep 2012
Delegated decision: Approved · LBS DM Historic Officer

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.