Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonCarshalton South & Clockhouse wardSM5 4EF17 Roman Way Carshalton SM5 4EFC2017/77012
Planning application · Sutton

C2017/77012.

17 Roman Way Carshalton SM5 4EF

Lawful Development Certificate at 17 Roman Way Carshalton SM5 4EF, received 27 Apr 2017 — refused on 12 Jun 2017.

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Jun 2017
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey rear extension.

Reference
C2017/77012
Type
Certificate of Proposed Use
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Council
Received
27 Apr 2017
Decision date
12 Jun 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
C2017/77012
Type
Certificate of Proposed Use
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Council
Received
27 Apr 2017
Decision date
12 Jun 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision
12 Jun 2017
Officer Report
12 Jun 2017
Drawing
5 May 2017
Drawing
5 May 2017
Drawing
5 May 2017
Decision
12 Jun 2017
Officer Report
12 Jun 2017
Drawing
5 May 2017
Show all 5 rows
Drawing
5 May 2017
Drawing
5 May 2017

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 12 Jun 2017 — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
27 Apr 2017
Application received
12 Jun 2017
Delegated decision: Refused
27 Apr 2017
Application received
12 Jun 2017
Delegated decision: Refused

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.