Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…St Helier wardSM5 1QQ58 Tintern Road Carshalton SM5 1QQ›C2017/77365
Planning application · Sutton

C2017/77365.

58 Tintern Road Carshalton SM5 1QQ

Householder at 58 Tintern Road Carshalton SM5 1QQ, received 16 Jun 2017 — approved on 23 Aug 2017 (delegated, Andrew Thornley).

Sutton›St Helier›SM5 1QQ›C2017/77365
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
23 Aug 2017
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of part one, part two storey rear extension and formation of front entrance porch.

Reference
C2017/77365
Type
Householder Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
16 Jun 2017
Validated
20 Jul 2017
Decision date
23 Aug 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Reference
C2017/77365
Type
Householder Application
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
16 Jun 2017
Validated
20 Jul 2017
Decision date
23 Aug 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 23 Aug 2017, delegated decision by Andrew Thornley — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
16 Jun 2017
Application received
20 Jul 2017
Application validated
23 Aug 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Andrew Thornley
16 Jun 2017
Application received
20 Jul 2017
Application validated
23 Aug 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Andrew Thornley

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.