Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…St Helier wardSM5 1AA›C2017/78257
Planning application · Sutton

C2017/78257.

St Helier Hospital Wrythe Lane Carshalton SM5 1AA

Lawful Development Certificate at St Helier Hospital Wrythe Lane Carshalton SM5 1AA, received 26 Oct 2017 — approved on 22 Dec 2017 (delegated, Andrew Thornley).

Sutton›St Helier›SM5 1AA›C2017/78257
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
22 Dec 2017
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of two entrance doors, a canopy and alterations to elevation.

Reference
C2017/78257
Type
Certificate of Proposed Use
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2017
Validated
8 Nov 2017
Decision date
22 Dec 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Council register
Reference
C2017/78257
Type
Certificate of Proposed Use
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2017
Validated
8 Nov 2017
Decision date
22 Dec 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 22 Dec 2017, delegated decision by Andrew Thornley — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Oct 2017
Application received
8 Nov 2017
Application validated
22 Dec 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Andrew Thornley
26 Oct 2017
Application received
8 Nov 2017
Application validated
22 Dec 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Andrew Thornley

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.