Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Sutton›…Beddington North wardCR0 4XS›D2017/76471
Planning application · Sutton

D2017/76471.

Tandem House Marlowe Way Beddington CR0 4XS

Full / Other Planning at Tandem House Marlowe Way Beddington CR0 4XS, received 14 Feb 2017 — approved on 6 Apr 2017 (delegated, Andrew Thornley).

Sutton›Beddington North›CR0 4XS›D2017/76471
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
6 Apr 2017
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Removal of condition 1 of planning permission D2010/63487/FUL that requires the conference centre to be used in association with Interport Ltd.

Reference
D2017/76471
Type
Full Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
14 Feb 2017
Target date
21 Mar 2017
Decision date
6 Apr 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Council register
Reference
D2017/76471
Type
Full Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
14 Feb 2017
Target date
21 Mar 2017
Decision date
6 Apr 2017
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 6 Apr 2017, delegated decision by Andrew Thornley — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Feb 2017
Application received
21 Mar 2017
Statutory target date
6 Apr 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Andrew Thornley
14 Feb 2017
Application received
21 Mar 2017
Statutory target date
6 Apr 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Andrew Thornley

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.