Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonCheam wardSM3 9SS31 Matlock Crescent Cheam Sutton SM3 9SSDM2019/00278
Planning application · Sutton

DM2019/00278.

31 Matlock Crescent Cheam Sutton SM3 9SS

Lawful Development Certificate at 31 Matlock Crescent Cheam Sutton SM3 9SS, received 13 Feb 2019 — approved on 17 Apr 2019 (delegated, Polly Davidson).

SuttonCheamSM3 9SSDM2019/00278
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Approved
Outcome
17 Apr 2019
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey rear extension.

Reference
DM2019/00278
Type
Certificate of Proposed Use
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
13 Feb 2019
Validated
26 Feb 2019
Decision date
17 Apr 2019
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Reference
DM2019/00278
Type
Certificate of Proposed Use
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
13 Feb 2019
Validated
26 Feb 2019
Decision date
17 Apr 2019
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Granted
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE GRANT CPU
17 Apr 2019
Officer Report
9 Apr 2019
AR 01
14 Feb 2019
APPLICATION FORM
14 Feb 2019
DECISION NOTICE GRANT CPU
17 Apr 2019
Officer Report
9 Apr 2019
AR 01
14 Feb 2019
Show all 4 rows
APPLICATION FORM
14 Feb 2019

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 17 Apr 2019, delegated decision by Polly Davidson — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Feb 2019
Application received
26 Feb 2019
Application validated
17 Apr 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Polly Davidson
13 Feb 2019
Application received
26 Feb 2019
Application validated
17 Apr 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Polly Davidson

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.