Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonWandle Valley wardDM2019/00291
Planning application · Sutton

DM2019/00291.

297 Peterborough Road Carshalton SM5 1DF

Householder at 297 Peterborough Road Carshalton SM5 1DF, received 18 Feb 2019 — not required on 29 Mar 2019 (delegated, Denuka Gunaratne).

SuttonWandle ValleySM5 1DFDM2019/00291
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Not required
Outcome
29 Mar 2019
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Prior Approval for single storey rear extension projecting from the rear of the original house by 6m.

Reference
DM2019/00291
Type
PA Householder Rear Extension
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 1DF
Council
Received
18 Feb 2019
Target date
18 Mar 2019
Decision date
29 Mar 2019
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Prior Approval Not Required
Reference
DM2019/00291
Type
PA Householder Rear Extension
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 1DF
Council
Received
18 Feb 2019
Target date
18 Mar 2019
Decision date
29 Mar 2019
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Prior Approval Not Required
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE NOT REQUIRED PAEXT
29 Mar 2019
OFFICER REPORT
28 Mar 2019
DRAWINGS
18 Feb 2019
DECISION NOTICE NOT REQUIRED PAEXT
29 Mar 2019
OFFICER REPORT
28 Mar 2019
DRAWINGS
18 Feb 2019

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Not required on 29 Mar 2019, delegated decision by Denuka Gunaratne — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Feb 2019
Application received
18 Mar 2019
Statutory target date
29 Mar 2019
Delegated decision: Not required · Denuka Gunaratne
18 Feb 2019
Application received
18 Mar 2019
Statutory target date
29 Mar 2019
Delegated decision: Not required · Denuka Gunaratne

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.