Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of first and second floor rear extension to existing dwelling and conversion of loft space to create a new dwelling involving alterations to existing roofline, dormer extensions at front and rear, rooflights to front roofslope and refuse and cycle storage.
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 4 Jun 2020, delegated decision by Denuka Gunaratne — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
9 Mar 2020
Application received
30 Mar 2020
Application validated
23 Apr 2020
Statutory target date
4 Jun 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
9 Mar 2020
Application received
30 Mar 2020
Application validated
23 Apr 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Jun 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed second floor rear extension by reason of its design, scale, bulk and height extending
out from the existing roofridge level would appear as a visually dominant and discordant addition that would
fail to be subordinate or respectful to the character of the existing building and would not be in keeping with
the prevailing pattern of development in the area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy 28 of the
Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in Supplementary Planning Document 4: The Design of Residential
Extensions.
2
The proposed second storey rear extension by reason of its excessive height, depth and scale and
proximity to the boundary would result in harm to the amenity of residents at No. 86 Stafford Road by way
of loss of outlook and increased sense of enclosure. The proposed extensions would therefore be contrary
to Policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
1
The proposed second floor rear extension by reason of its design, scale, bulk and height extending
out from the existing roofridge level would appear as a visually dominant and discordant addition that would
fail to be subordinate or respectful to the character of the existing building and would not be in keeping with
the prevailing pattern of development in the area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy 28 of the
Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in Supplementary Planning Document 4: The Design of Residential
Extensions.
2
The proposed second storey rear extension by reason of its excessive height, depth and scale and
proximity to the boundary would result in harm to the amenity of residents at No. 86 Stafford Road by way
of loss of outlook and increased sense of enclosure. The proposed extensions would therefore be contrary
to Policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.