Planning application · Sutton
DM2020/01407.
Greenview House 5 Manor Road Wallington SM6 0BW
Full / Other Planning at Greenview House 5 Manor Road Wallington SM6 0BW, received 10 Sep 2020 — refused on 30 Sep 2021 (delegated, Steven Hoang).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 Sep 2021
55 wks
Decision time
47 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
34
Documents
34 linked
1
Objections
1 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Change of Use from Offices (Use Class B1a) to Education (Use Class F.1)
Reference
DM2020/01407
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
10 Sep 2020
Target date
23 Oct 2020
Decision date
30 Sep 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Reference
DM2020/01407
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
10 Sep 2020
Target date
23 Oct 2020
Decision date
30 Sep 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 30 Sep 2021, delegated decision by Steven Hoang — 55 weeks from submission (47 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
10 Sep 2020
Application received
23 Oct 2020
Statutory target date
30 Sep 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Steven Hoang
10 Sep 2020
Application received
23 Oct 2020
Statutory target date
30 Sep 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Steven Hoang
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of insufficient information demonstrating and detailing of the
expected trip generation and lack of clarity regarding on site maneuvering and drop off arrangements for
the proposed school, the sites location on a busy junction, could result in significant adverse impact to the
detriment of the safe and efficient operation of the public highway network. As such the proposal is contrary
to policy 36 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and paragraph 111 of the NPPF.
2
The proposed development, due to the lack of information to demonstrate the need for the proposed
education use (Class F.1), would not constitute an acceptable town centre use within the Wallington Green
Local Centre. The proposed use would not be a suitable replacement function and would result in harm to
the vitality and viability of the Wallington Green Local Centre, contrary to Policy S3 of the London Plan
2021 and policies 17 and 18 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
3
The proposal, due to the covered play area being provided within an existing undercroft parking
area and playground being located in between parking bays, would fail to incorporate suitable outdoor
space for future students, contrary to Policy S3 of the London Plan 2021.
1
The proposed development, by reason of insufficient information demonstrating and detailing of the
expected trip generation and lack of clarity regarding on site maneuvering and drop off arrangements for
the proposed school, the sites location on a busy junction, could result in significant adverse impact to the
detriment of the safe and efficient operation of the public highway network. As such the proposal is contrary
to policy 36 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and paragraph 111 of the NPPF.
2
The proposed development, due to the lack of information to demonstrate the need for the proposed
education use (Class F.1), would not constitute an acceptable town centre use within the Wallington Green
Local Centre. The proposed use would not be a suitable replacement function and would result in harm to
the vitality and viability of the Wallington Green Local Centre, contrary to Policy S3 of the London Plan
2021 and policies 17 and 18 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
3
The proposal, due to the covered play area being provided within an existing undercroft parking
area and playground being located in between parking bays, would fail to incorporate suitable outdoor
space for future students, contrary to Policy S3 of the London Plan 2021.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 36NPPFS3Sutton Local Plan 17Sutton Local Plan 18
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
1
Total comments
2
Objections
1
In support
1
Total comments
2
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.