Planning application · Sutton
DM2020/01726.
193 Glastonbury Road Morden SM4 6PE
Householder at 193 Glastonbury Road Morden SM4 6PE, received 26 Oct 2020 — refused on 18 Mar 2021 (delegated, Denuka Gunaratne).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Mar 2021
20 wks
Decision time
12 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a single storey rear extension, first floor side extension and conversion of loft space involving a dormer to the rear with three rooflights to front roof slope.
Reference
DM2020/01726
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2020
Validated
21 Jan 2021
Target date
18 Feb 2021
Decision date
18 Mar 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Premises record
Council register
Reference
DM2020/01726
Type
Householder Application
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2020
Validated
21 Jan 2021
Target date
18 Feb 2021
Decision date
18 Mar 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 18 Mar 2021, delegated decision by Denuka Gunaratne — 20 weeks from submission (12 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
26 Oct 2020
Application received
21 Jan 2021
Application validated
18 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
18 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
26 Oct 2020
Application received
21 Jan 2021
Application validated
18 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
18 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed two storey side extension, due to its excessive size, width, scale and siting extending
up to the existing roof ridge level, the main front building line and the side boundary, in conjunction with the
excessively wide and bulky rear roof dormer extension would constitute an overdevelopment of the site,
resulting in an incongruous, unsympathetic and overdominant form of development which is highly visible
within the streetscene and from neighbouring properties and rear gardens. Furthermore, the proposal
would not be subservient to the main building and would not be in keeping with the prevailing pattern of
development in the area. In this respect the proposal if permitted would harm the character and
appearance of the streetscene, contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in
Supplementary Planning Document 4: The Design of Residential Extensions and Supplementary Planning
Document 14 'Creating Locally Distinctive Places' and Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021.
1
The proposed two storey side extension, due to its excessive size, width, scale and siting extending
up to the existing roof ridge level, the main front building line and the side boundary, in conjunction with the
excessively wide and bulky rear roof dormer extension would constitute an overdevelopment of the site,
resulting in an incongruous, unsympathetic and overdominant form of development which is highly visible
within the streetscene and from neighbouring properties and rear gardens. Furthermore, the proposal
would not be subservient to the main building and would not be in keeping with the prevailing pattern of
development in the area. In this respect the proposal if permitted would harm the character and
appearance of the streetscene, contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in
Supplementary Planning Document 4: The Design of Residential Extensions and Supplementary Planning
Document 14 'Creating Locally Distinctive Places' and Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28D3D4
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.