Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonCheam wardSM3 8NW18 Lumley Gardens Cheam SM3 8NWDM2020/01734
Planning application · Sutton

DM2020/01734.

18 Lumley Gardens Cheam SM3 8NW

Householder at 18 Lumley Gardens Cheam SM3 8NW, received 26 Oct 2020 — refused on 22 Dec 2020 (delegated, Polly Davidson).

SuttonCheamSM3 8NWDM2020/01734
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 Dec 2020
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Prior Approval for a single storey rear extension projecting from the rear of the original house by 3.95m.

Reference
DM2020/01734
Type
PA Householder Rear Extension
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2020
Validated
16 Nov 2020
Target date
10 Dec 2020
Decision date
22 Dec 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Prior Approval Refused
Reference
DM2020/01734
Type
PA Householder Rear Extension
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2020
Validated
16 Nov 2020
Target date
10 Dec 2020
Decision date
22 Dec 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Prior Approval Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED PAEXT
22 Dec 2020
5
16 Nov 2020
1B
12 Nov 2020
2E
12 Nov 2020
3C
12 Nov 2020
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
26 Oct 2020
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED PAEXT
22 Dec 2020
5
16 Nov 2020
1B
12 Nov 2020
Show all 6 rows
2E
12 Nov 2020
3C
12 Nov 2020
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
26 Oct 2020

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 22 Dec 2020, delegated decision by Polly Davidson — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Oct 2020
Application received
16 Nov 2020
Application validated
10 Dec 2020
Statutory target date
22 Dec 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Polly Davidson
26 Oct 2020
Application received
16 Nov 2020
Application validated
10 Dec 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
22 Dec 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Polly Davidson

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal fails to meet A.1 (j)(iii) and (ja) as set out in Schedule 2 Part 1 Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, as amended, as the proposed single storey rear extension infringes on the dimensions set out in relation to side walls.
2
The proposal fails to meet criteria (k)(iv) as set out in Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development Order) 2015 as amended as the proposed development includes alterations to the roof and so infringes on the criteria set out in Class A.
1
The proposal fails to meet A.1 (j)(iii) and (ja) as set out in Schedule 2 Part 1 Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, as amended, as the proposed single storey rear extension infringes on the dimensions set out in relation to side walls.
2
The proposal fails to meet criteria (k)(iv) as set out in Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development Order) 2015 as amended as the proposed development includes alterations to the roof and so infringes on the criteria set out in Class A.

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.