Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonSutton North wardDM2021/01992
Planning application · Sutton

DM2021/01992.

32A Lymescote Gardens Sutton SM1 2PN

Householder at 32A Lymescote Gardens Sutton SM1 2PN, received 4 Oct 2021 — refused on 14 Dec 2021 (delegated, Polly Davidson).

SuttonSutton NorthSM1 2PNDM2021/01992
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Dec 2021
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
1 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey rear extension.

Reference
DM2021/01992
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 2PN
Council
Received
4 Oct 2021
Validated
21 Oct 2021
Target date
30 Nov 2021
Decision date
14 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2021/01992
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 2PN
Council
Received
4 Oct 2021
Validated
21 Oct 2021
Target date
30 Nov 2021
Decision date
14 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
14 Dec 2021
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
14 Dec 2021
DWG 202 REV.A
9 Nov 2021
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
4 Oct 2021
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
4 Oct 2021
PLANNING-BLOCK PLAN SITE PLAN AND ORDNANCE SURVEY PLAN DWG 2
4 Oct 2021
DWG 101
4 Oct 2021
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
14 Dec 2021
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
14 Dec 2021
DWG 202 REV.A
9 Nov 2021
Show all 7 rows
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
4 Oct 2021
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
4 Oct 2021
PLANNING-BLOCK PLAN SITE PLAN AND ORDNANCE SURVEY PLAN DWG 2
4 Oct 2021
DWG 101
4 Oct 2021

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 14 Dec 2021, delegated decision by Polly Davidson — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Oct 2021
Application received
21 Oct 2021
Application validated
30 Nov 2021
Statutory target date
14 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Polly Davidson
4 Oct 2021
Application received
21 Oct 2021
Application validated
30 Nov 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Polly Davidson

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal would fail to relate sympathetically or subordinately to the existing dwelling, appearing overly dominant and significantly altering the appearance of the rear elevation of the property due to the depth of the extension. The proposal would result in an incongruous addition that would cause significant and unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the dwelling. As such, the proposal would be contrary to policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
1
The proposal would fail to relate sympathetically or subordinately to the existing dwelling, appearing overly dominant and significantly altering the appearance of the rear elevation of the property due to the depth of the extension. The proposal would result in an incongruous addition that would cause significant and unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the dwelling. As such, the proposal would be contrary to policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
1
Total comments
1
Objections
0
In support
1
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.