Planning application · Sutton
DM2021/02023.
Full / Other Planning at 48 Golf Side Cheam SM2 7EZ, received 8 Oct 2021 — refused on 18 Jul 2022 by committee.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Jul 2022
40 wks
Decision time
32 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
37
Documents
37 linked
28
Objections
5 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Allowed
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of existing bungalow and erection of a two storey detached dwelling with detached double garage.
Reference
DM2021/02023
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM2 7EZ
Ward
Council
Received
8 Oct 2021
Validated
15 Nov 2021
Target date
24 Dec 2021
Decision date
18 Jul 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Reference
DM2021/02023
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM2 7EZ
Ward
Council
Received
8 Oct 2021
Validated
15 Nov 2021
Target date
24 Dec 2021
Decision date
18 Jul 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 18 Jul 2022, determined by the planning committee — 40 weeks from submission (32 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
8 Oct 2021
Application received
15 Nov 2021
Application validated
24 Dec 2021
Statutory target date
18 Jul 2022
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal Allowed · Appeal Allowed
8 Oct 2021
Application received
15 Nov 2021
Application validated
24 Dec 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
18 Jul 2022
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal Allowed · Appeal Allowed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
By virtue of its massing, scale and height the proposed development would appear as an
incongruous and dominant form of development which would detract from the appearance of, and
significantly reduce the openness of the Golf Side streetscene and the wider surrounding area including the
Burton Estates Area of Special Local Character. The proposal therefore would be harmful to the site and it
its contribution to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 and D4 of
the London Plan, Policy 28 and 30 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the Council's adopted Supplementary
Planning Document 14: Creating Locally Distinctive Places.
1
By virtue of its massing, scale and height the proposed development would appear as an
incongruous and dominant form of development which would detract from the appearance of, and
significantly reduce the openness of the Golf Side streetscene and the wider surrounding area including the
Burton Estates Area of Special Local Character. The proposal therefore would be harmful to the site and it
its contribution to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 and D4 of
the London Plan, Policy 28 and 30 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the Council's adopted Supplementary
Planning Document 14: Creating Locally Distinctive Places.
Policies cited
D3D4Sutton Local Plan 28Sutton Local Plan 30
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Allowed
Outcome: Appeal Allowed
Appeal Allowed
Outcome: Appeal Allowed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
28
In support
5
Total comments
33
Objections
28
In support
5
Total comments
33
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.