Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonStonecot wardDM2022/00116
Planning application · Sutton

DM2022/00116.

370 Gander Green Lane North Cheam SM3 9RA

Full / Other Planning at 370 Gander Green Lane North Cheam SM3 9RA, received 21 Jan 2022 — refused on 4 Oct 2022 (delegated, Emmanuel Agyei).

SuttonStonecotSM3 9RADM2022/00116
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Oct 2022
37 wks
Decision time
29 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
2
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of existing garage at rear and erection of a two storey detached dwelling with vehicular access, cycle and refuse stores and parking.

Reference
DM2022/00116
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM3 9RA
Council
Received
21 Jan 2022
Validated
10 Aug 2022
Target date
14 Sep 2022
Decision date
4 Oct 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2022/00116
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM3 9RA
Council
Received
21 Jan 2022
Validated
10 Aug 2022
Target date
14 Sep 2022
Decision date
4 Oct 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL
4 Oct 2022
OFFICER REPORT
4 Oct 2022
MISS ROSANNA WHICHELOE
28 Sept 2022
MR PATRICK WHITTER
31 Aug 2022
MR MOHAMAD KABASH
26 Aug 2022
WASTE MANAGEMENT TEAM
26 Aug 2022
MX POLLUTION CONTROL
25 Aug 2022
ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
18 Aug 2022
109-001-P03-EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
19 Apr 2022
109-012-P03-EXISTING SITE PLAN
19 Apr 2022
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL
4 Oct 2022
OFFICER REPORT
4 Oct 2022
MISS ROSANNA WHICHELOE
28 Sept 2022
Show all 10 rows
MR PATRICK WHITTER
31 Aug 2022
MR MOHAMAD KABASH
26 Aug 2022
WASTE MANAGEMENT TEAM
26 Aug 2022
MX POLLUTION CONTROL
25 Aug 2022
ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
18 Aug 2022
109-001-P03-EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
19 Apr 2022
109-012-P03-EXISTING SITE PLAN
19 Apr 2022

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 4 Oct 2022, delegated decision by Emmanuel Agyei — 37 weeks from submission (29 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Jan 2022
Application received
10 Aug 2022
Application validated
14 Sep 2022
Statutory target date
4 Oct 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei
21 Jan 2022
Application received
10 Aug 2022
Application validated
14 Sep 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Oct 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of the restricted plot size and overall proportion and massing of the new dwelling would constitute an incongruous and cramped form of overdevelopment which would be entirely out of keeping with the general pattern of development in the area. The development would therefore be contrary to policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2011, Policies 1, 13 and 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the Council's adopted Supplementary Planning Document 14.
2
By reason of it siting, size and detailed design, the proposed development would result in a significant adverse effect on the established character of the site and the setting of the site and surrounding area contrary to Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021, Policies 1 and 28 of the Local Plan and the Council's Supplementary Planning Document 14.
3
The proposed development, due to its siting, design and the close proximity to 372 Gander Green Lane, would result in unacceptable harm to the amenities of the occupiers of this property by virtue of both actual and perceived overlooking, contrary to Policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
4
Without evidence to the contrary, the application has failed to provide evidence that the proposal will provide a satisfactory reduction in carbon emissions and energy efficiency measures. As such, the application would be contrary to Policy SI 2 of the London Plan 2021 and Policy 31 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
1
The proposed development, by reason of the restricted plot size and overall proportion and massing of the new dwelling would constitute an incongruous and cramped form of overdevelopment which would be entirely out of keeping with the general pattern of development in the area. The development would therefore be contrary to policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2011, Policies 1, 13 and 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the Council's adopted Supplementary Planning Document 14.
2
By reason of it siting, size and detailed design, the proposed development would result in a significant adverse effect on the established character of the site and the setting of the site and surrounding area contrary to Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021, Policies 1 and 28 of the Local Plan and the Council's Supplementary Planning Document 14.
3
The proposed development, due to its siting, design and the close proximity to 372 Gander Green Lane, would result in unacceptable harm to the amenities of the occupiers of this property by virtue of both actual and perceived overlooking, contrary to Policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Show all 4 rows
4
Without evidence to the contrary, the application has failed to provide evidence that the proposal will provide a satisfactory reduction in carbon emissions and energy efficiency measures. As such, the application would be contrary to Policy SI 2 of the London Plan 2021 and Policy 31 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Policies cited
D3D4Sutton Local Plan 1Sutton Local Plan 13Sutton Local Plan 28Local Plan 1Local Plan 28Sutton Local Plan 29SI2Sutton Local Plan 31

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.