Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonNorth Cheam wardKT4 8TL23 Cheam Common Road Worcester Park KT4 8TLDM2022/00163
Planning application · Sutton

DM2022/00163.

23 Cheam Common Road Worcester Park KT4 8TL

Full / Other Planning at 23 Cheam Common Road Worcester Park KT4 8TL, received 28 Jan 2022 — refused on 17 May 2022 (delegated, Polly Davidson).

SuttonNorth CheamKT4 8TLDM2022/00163
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 May 2022
16 wks
Decision time
8 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
1
Objections
2 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of front extension.

Reference
DM2022/00163
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
28 Jan 2022
Validated
21 Mar 2022
Target date
29 Apr 2022
Decision date
17 May 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2022/00163
Type
Full Application
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
28 Jan 2022
Validated
21 Mar 2022
Target date
29 Apr 2022
Decision date
17 May 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal Decision
22 Feb 2023
ST030-02
22 Aug 2022
OFFICER REPORT
17 May 2022
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL
17 May 2022
Site Notice
12 Apr 2022
TFL
11 Apr 2022
MX POLLUTION CONTROL
8 Apr 2022
ST030-03A
5 Apr 2022
ST030-04A
5 Apr 2022
ST030-01A
21 Mar 2022
Appeal Decision
22 Feb 2023
ST030-02
22 Aug 2022
OFFICER REPORT
17 May 2022
Show all 10 rows
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL
17 May 2022
Site Notice
12 Apr 2022
TFL
11 Apr 2022
MX POLLUTION CONTROL
8 Apr 2022
ST030-03A
5 Apr 2022
ST030-04A
5 Apr 2022
ST030-01A
21 Mar 2022

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 May 2022, delegated decision by Polly Davidson — 16 weeks from submission (8 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Jan 2022
Application received
21 Mar 2022
Application validated
29 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
17 May 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Polly Davidson
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
28 Jan 2022
Application received
21 Mar 2022
Application validated
29 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
17 May 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Polly Davidson
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The extension to the application property constitutes an unduly visually dominant structure that fails to respect the character of the existing building adversely affecting its appearance, and that of the streetscene and character of the surrounding area. The application is therefore contrary to National Planning Policy Framework, Policy D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021, Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan, and the Council's adopted Supplementary Planning Document 14: Creating Locally Distinctive Places.
1
The extension to the application property constitutes an unduly visually dominant structure that fails to respect the character of the existing building adversely affecting its appearance, and that of the streetscene and character of the surrounding area. The application is therefore contrary to National Planning Policy Framework, Policy D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021, Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan, and the Council's adopted Supplementary Planning Document 14: Creating Locally Distinctive Places.
Policies cited
D3D4Sutton Local Plan 28NPPF

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
2
Total comments
3
Objections
1
In support
2
Total comments
3
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.