Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a single storeyside/ rear extension and provision of a patio area to the rear. Conversion of garage into a habitable room and replacement front porch.
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 25 Apr 2022, delegated decision by Alexandra Lee — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
18 Feb 2022
Application received
28 Feb 2022
Application validated
6 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
25 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Alexandra Lee
18 Feb 2022
Application received
28 Feb 2022
Application validated
6 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
25 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Alexandra Lee
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extension, by reason of its excessive depth, width and design would result in
excessive bulk and massing which would result in a disproportionate addition to the existing building.
Additionally by reason of its modern design and mismatching roof to the existing, the proposed single
storey side/rear extension would be overdominant, incongruous and detrimental to the character and
appearance of the existing dwellinghouse and the Areas of Special Local Character (ASLC's). The proposal
would therefore be contrary to the principles of the National Planning Policy Framework, policies 28 and 30
of the Sutton Local Plan, and SPD4 'Design of Residential Extensions'.
1
The proposed extension, by reason of its excessive depth, width and design would result in
excessive bulk and massing which would result in a disproportionate addition to the existing building.
Additionally by reason of its modern design and mismatching roof to the existing, the proposed single
storey side/rear extension would be overdominant, incongruous and detrimental to the character and
appearance of the existing dwellinghouse and the Areas of Special Local Character (ASLC's). The proposal
would therefore be contrary to the principles of the National Planning Policy Framework, policies 28 and 30
of the Sutton Local Plan, and SPD4 'Design of Residential Extensions'.
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.