Planning application · Sutton
DM2022/00449.
234 Collingwood Road Sutton SM1 2NX
Householder at 234 Collingwood Road Sutton SM1 2NX, received 9 Mar 2022 — refused on 8 Jul 2022 (delegated, Tabitha Lythe).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Jul 2022
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a first floor side and rear extension.
Reference
DM2022/00449
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 2NX
Ward
Council
Received
9 Mar 2022
Validated
18 Mar 2022
Target date
15 Apr 2022
Decision date
8 Jul 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Reference
DM2022/00449
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 2NX
Ward
Council
Received
9 Mar 2022
Validated
18 Mar 2022
Target date
15 Apr 2022
Decision date
8 Jul 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 8 Jul 2022, delegated decision by Tabitha Lythe — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
9 Mar 2022
Application received
18 Mar 2022
Application validated
15 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
8 Jul 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Tabitha Lythe
9 Mar 2022
Application received
18 Mar 2022
Application validated
15 Apr 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
8 Jul 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Tabitha Lythe
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor side and rear extension, by reason of its siting in a prominent corner
location and excessive cumulative depth along the flank boundary line to the north west and Anton
Crescent, would result in a disproportionate and incongruous addition that would lack subordination to the
main dwelling and would significantly diminish the sense of spaciousness at this corner and along this
section of Anton Crescent, and would appear as an overbearing addition in comparison to neighbouring
properties. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the guidance
contained within SPD 4 'Design of Residential Extensions.
1
The proposed first floor side and rear extension, by reason of its siting in a prominent corner
location and excessive cumulative depth along the flank boundary line to the north west and Anton
Crescent, would result in a disproportionate and incongruous addition that would lack subordination to the
main dwelling and would significantly diminish the sense of spaciousness at this corner and along this
section of Anton Crescent, and would appear as an overbearing addition in comparison to neighbouring
properties. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the guidance
contained within SPD 4 'Design of Residential Extensions.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.