Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a three storey rear extension, extension at roof level including the conversion of loft space involving a dormer extension at rear with rooflights to side roofslope in connection with the provision of an additional self contained dwelling. Rear balconies and balustrades, parking at rear and cycle and waste storage.
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 16 May 2023, delegated decision by Ben Rochford — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
6 Mar 2023
Application received
21 Mar 2023
Application validated
24 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
16 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford
6 Mar 2023
Application received
21 Mar 2023
Application validated
24 Apr 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
16 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, due its excessive scale, bulk, mass, height and depth, would appear
disproportionate, overly dominant and as an overdevelopment within the limited plot, eradicating the
openness that exists to the rear of the parade and it is considered that the design of the proposal is
unacceptable and would cause harm to the character of the St Helier Estate Area of Special Local
Character and wider streetscene, contrary to policy D3 of the London Plan 2021 and policies 28 and 30 of
the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
2
Due to the excessive size of the proposed extensions, within close proximity of the upper flat(s) at
373 Green Wrythe Lane, it is considered that the proposal would adversely impact on 373 Green Wrythe
Lane in terms of creating a sense of enclosure and appearing overbearing, resulting in a loss of outlook.
The proposal is therefore contrary to policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
3
No information has been provided to demonstrate that the extensions would not result in a loss of
light to 373 Green Wrythe Lane and as such, without evidence to the contrary in the form of a light report,
due to the excessive size of the extensions within close proximity of 373 Green Wrythe Lane, it is
considered that the proposal would adversely impact on 373 Green Wrythe Lane in terms of loss of light.
The proposal is therefore contrary to policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
1
The proposed development, due its excessive scale, bulk, mass, height and depth, would appear
disproportionate, overly dominant and as an overdevelopment within the limited plot, eradicating the
openness that exists to the rear of the parade and it is considered that the design of the proposal is
unacceptable and would cause harm to the character of the St Helier Estate Area of Special Local
Character and wider streetscene, contrary to policy D3 of the London Plan 2021 and policies 28 and 30 of
the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
2
Due to the excessive size of the proposed extensions, within close proximity of the upper flat(s) at
373 Green Wrythe Lane, it is considered that the proposal would adversely impact on 373 Green Wrythe
Lane in terms of creating a sense of enclosure and appearing overbearing, resulting in a loss of outlook.
The proposal is therefore contrary to policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
3
No information has been provided to demonstrate that the extensions would not result in a loss of
light to 373 Green Wrythe Lane and as such, without evidence to the contrary in the form of a light report,
due to the excessive size of the extensions within close proximity of 373 Green Wrythe Lane, it is
considered that the proposal would adversely impact on 373 Green Wrythe Lane in terms of loss of light.
The proposal is therefore contrary to policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Policies cited
D3Sutton Local Plan 28Sutton Local Plan 30Sutton Local Plan 29
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.