Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonCarshalton Central wardDM2023/00827
Planning application · Sutton

DM2023/00827.

26 Meadow Road Sutton SM1 4NF

Householder at 26 Meadow Road Sutton SM1 4NF, received 18 May 2023 — refused on 31 Jul 2023 (delegated, Ben Rochford).

SuttonCarshalton CentralSM1 4NFDM2023/00827
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
31 Jul 2023
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey side and rear extension, conversion of loft space involving alteration to existing roofline and a dormer to rear with rooflight to front roofslope.

Reference
DM2023/00827
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 4NF
Council
Received
18 May 2023
Validated
5 Jun 2023
Target date
5 Jul 2023
Decision date
31 Jul 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2023/00827
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 4NF
Council
Received
18 May 2023
Validated
5 Jun 2023
Target date
5 Jul 2023
Decision date
31 Jul 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
31 Jul 2023
A107
14 Jun 2023
A106
14 Jun 2023
A105
14 Jun 2023
A104
14 Jun 2023
A103
14 Jun 2023
A101
14 Jun 2023
A102
14 Jun 2023
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
18 May 2023
26 MEADOW RD FIRE SAFETY
18 May 2023
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
31 Jul 2023
A107
14 Jun 2023
A106
14 Jun 2023
Show all 10 rows
A105
14 Jun 2023
A104
14 Jun 2023
A103
14 Jun 2023
A101
14 Jun 2023
A102
14 Jun 2023
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
18 May 2023
26 MEADOW RD FIRE SAFETY
18 May 2023

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 31 Jul 2023, delegated decision by Ben Rochford — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
18 May 2023
Application received
5 Jun 2023
Application validated
5 Jul 2023
Statutory target date
31 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford
18 May 2023
Application received
5 Jun 2023
Application validated
5 Jul 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
31 Jul 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed loft conversion, due to the bulk, depth and overall volume increase at roof level, would appear excessive, disproportionate, top-heavy and overly dominant. In addition, the proposed rear dormer would fill the entire rear roof slope, appearing large and box-like, to the detriment of the wider street block. As such, the development would introduce a visually overbearing roof design to the streetscene that is of an overall poor design quality, causing harm to the character of the area and streetscene contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and 'Design of Residential Extensions' SPD4.
1
The proposed loft conversion, due to the bulk, depth and overall volume increase at roof level, would appear excessive, disproportionate, top-heavy and overly dominant. In addition, the proposed rear dormer would fill the entire rear roof slope, appearing large and box-like, to the detriment of the wider street block. As such, the development would introduce a visually overbearing roof design to the streetscene that is of an overall poor design quality, causing harm to the character of the area and streetscene contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and 'Design of Residential Extensions' SPD4.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.