Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonWallington South wardDM2023/01391
Planning application · Sutton

DM2023/01391.

1 Elgin Road Wallington SM6 8RE

Full / Other Planning at 1 Elgin Road Wallington SM6 8RE, received 5 Sep 2023 — refused on 3 Jan 2024 (delegated, Denuka Gunaratne).

SuttonWallington SouthSM6 8REDM2023/01391
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Jan 2024
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
40
Documents
40 linked
2
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a two-storey side extension to form an end of terraced two-storey house to provide additional two self-contained residential flats and side extensions to existing four residential flats, including a subdivision of the rear garden area with boundary fence to the rear, associated soft and hard landscaping and provision of refuse storage at the front.

Reference
DM2023/01391
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM6 8RE
Council
Received
5 Sep 2023
Validated
8 Nov 2023
Target date
25 Dec 2023
Decision date
3 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2023/01391
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM6 8RE
Council
Received
5 Sep 2023
Validated
8 Nov 2023
Target date
25 Dec 2023
Decision date
3 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal Decision
12 Nov 2024
OFFICER REPORT
12 Apr 2024
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL
3 Jan 2024
MR EDWARD BUCKTON
13 Dec 2023
MR JIFU ZUO
30 Nov 2023
WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMENTS
25 Nov 2023
MR PATRICK WHITTER
20 Nov 2023
MX POLLUTION CONTROL
14 Nov 2023
003 REV A
8 Nov 2023
004
8 Nov 2023
Appeal Decision
12 Nov 2024
OFFICER REPORT
12 Apr 2024
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL
3 Jan 2024
Show all 10 rows
MR EDWARD BUCKTON
13 Dec 2023
MR JIFU ZUO
30 Nov 2023
WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMENTS
25 Nov 2023
MR PATRICK WHITTER
20 Nov 2023
MX POLLUTION CONTROL
14 Nov 2023
003 REV A
8 Nov 2023
004
8 Nov 2023

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 Jan 2024, delegated decision by Denuka Gunaratne — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Sep 2023
Application received
8 Nov 2023
Application validated
25 Dec 2023
Statutory target date
3 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
5 Sep 2023
Application received
8 Nov 2023
Application validated
25 Dec 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
3 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, due to its design, excessive depth, width, scale and siting would result in the cramped overdevelopment of the site and would be an over dominant and incongruous feature, which would result in the creation of an end of terrace building which would fail to harmonise with the character of the adjoining semi-detached properties and would therefore adversely harm the character and appearance of the streetscene thereby detracting from the local pattern of development and would appear out of character with the streetscene. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in Supplementary Planning Document 14 'Creating Locally Distinctive Places' and Policies D1 and D4 of the London Plan 2021.
2
The proposed development, by reason of its siting would result in harm to the amenities of the occupiers of Flats 1 and 4, 1 Elgin Road by way of loss of outlook, increase sense of enclosure and loss of daylight. As such, the development would therefore be contrary to Policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
1
The proposed development, due to its design, excessive depth, width, scale and siting would result in the cramped overdevelopment of the site and would be an over dominant and incongruous feature, which would result in the creation of an end of terrace building which would fail to harmonise with the character of the adjoining semi-detached properties and would therefore adversely harm the character and appearance of the streetscene thereby detracting from the local pattern of development and would appear out of character with the streetscene. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in Supplementary Planning Document 14 'Creating Locally Distinctive Places' and Policies D1 and D4 of the London Plan 2021.
2
The proposed development, by reason of its siting would result in harm to the amenities of the occupiers of Flats 1 and 4, 1 Elgin Road by way of loss of outlook, increase sense of enclosure and loss of daylight. As such, the development would therefore be contrary to Policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28D1D4Sutton Local Plan 29

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.