Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonCarshalton Central wardDM2023/01704
Planning application · Sutton

DM2023/01704.

79 Park Lane Carshalton SM5 3EE

Householder at 79 Park Lane Carshalton SM5 3EE, received 13 Nov 2023 — refused on 4 Jan 2024 (delegated, John Grierson).

SuttonCarshalton CentralSM5 3EEDM2023/01704
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Jan 2024
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Formation of a new vehicle crossover, alteration to existing front boundary wall and provision of hardstanding.

Reference
DM2023/01704
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 3EE
Council
Received
13 Nov 2023
Target date
6 Dec 2023
Decision date
4 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2023/01704
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 3EE
Council
Received
13 Nov 2023
Target date
6 Dec 2023
Decision date
4 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
4 Jan 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
4 Jan 2024
MR EDWARD BUCKTON
14 Dec 2023
MR JIFU ZUO
28 Nov 2023
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
13 Nov 2023
FIRE SAFETY STATEMENT
13 Nov 2023
E101
13 Nov 2023
E102
13 Nov 2023
V101
13 Nov 2023
P101
13 Nov 2023
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
4 Jan 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
4 Jan 2024
MR EDWARD BUCKTON
14 Dec 2023
Show all 10 rows
MR JIFU ZUO
28 Nov 2023
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
13 Nov 2023
FIRE SAFETY STATEMENT
13 Nov 2023
E101
13 Nov 2023
E102
13 Nov 2023
V101
13 Nov 2023
P101
13 Nov 2023

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 4 Jan 2024, delegated decision by John Grierson — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Nov 2023
Application received
6 Dec 2023
Statutory target date
4 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · John Grierson
13 Nov 2023
Application received
6 Dec 2023
Statutory target date
4 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · John Grierson

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
In the absence of evidence to indicate otherwise, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed development would not unduly impact on the health of existing street tree(s), given the potential for root damage during and after construction, which could potentially cause harm to the tree(s) health to the detriment of the character and appearance of the local landscape. It is therefore considered that the proposal fails to demonstrate that the character of the area would be protected, contrary to Policies D1 and G7 of the London Plan 2021 and Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
1
In the absence of evidence to indicate otherwise, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed development would not unduly impact on the health of existing street tree(s), given the potential for root damage during and after construction, which could potentially cause harm to the tree(s) health to the detriment of the character and appearance of the local landscape. It is therefore considered that the proposal fails to demonstrate that the character of the area would be protected, contrary to Policies D1 and G7 of the London Plan 2021 and Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Policies cited
D1G7Sutton Local Plan 28

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.