Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonCarshalton South & Clockhouse wardDM2023/01848
Planning application · Sutton

DM2023/01848.

48 Beeches Avenue Carshalton SM5 3LW

Householder at 48 Beeches Avenue Carshalton SM5 3LW, received 8 Dec 2023 — refused on 29 Feb 2024 (delegated, Denuka Gunaratne).

SuttonCarshalton South & ClockhouseSM5 3LWDM2023/01848
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Feb 2024
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
20
Documents
20 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Roof extension including increase in ridge height in connection with the Conversion of loft space into habitable accommodation.

Reference
DM2023/01848
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 3LW
Council
Received
8 Dec 2023
Validated
5 Jan 2024
Target date
1 Feb 2024
Decision date
29 Feb 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2023/01848
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 3LW
Council
Received
8 Dec 2023
Validated
5 Jan 2024
Target date
1 Feb 2024
Decision date
29 Feb 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
29 Feb 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
29 Feb 2024
FIRE SAFETY STRATEGY (PART A) - REASONABLE EXCEPTION STATEME
5 Jan 2024
23195 - P107 REV A
5 Jan 2024
23195 - P108 REV A
5 Jan 2024
23195 - P112 REV A
5 Jan 2024
23195 - P113 REV A
5 Jan 2024
23195 - P114 REV A
5 Jan 2024
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
8 Dec 2023
LETTER FROM APPLICANT
8 Dec 2023
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
29 Feb 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
29 Feb 2024
FIRE SAFETY STRATEGY (PART A) - REASONABLE EXCEPTION STATEME
5 Jan 2024
Show all 10 rows
23195 - P107 REV A
5 Jan 2024
23195 - P108 REV A
5 Jan 2024
23195 - P112 REV A
5 Jan 2024
23195 - P113 REV A
5 Jan 2024
23195 - P114 REV A
5 Jan 2024
APPLICATION FORM (NO PERSONAL DATA)
8 Dec 2023
LETTER FROM APPLICANT
8 Dec 2023

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 29 Feb 2024, delegated decision by Denuka Gunaratne — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Dec 2023
Application received
5 Jan 2024
Application validated
1 Feb 2024
Statutory target date
29 Feb 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
8 Dec 2023
Application received
5 Jan 2024
Application validated
1 Feb 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
29 Feb 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed roof extension due to its design, size, scale and siting extending above existing roof ridge, would result in an incongruous, unsympathetic and over dominant form of development which is highly visible within the streetscene and would undermine the symmetry of this pair of semi- detached houses (no's 46 and 48) and would not be in keeping with the prevailing pattern of development in the area. As such, the proposal is contrary to policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in Supplementary Planning Document 4: The Design of Residential Extensions.
1
The proposed roof extension due to its design, size, scale and siting extending above existing roof ridge, would result in an incongruous, unsympathetic and over dominant form of development which is highly visible within the streetscene and would undermine the symmetry of this pair of semi- detached houses (no's 46 and 48) and would not be in keeping with the prevailing pattern of development in the area. As such, the proposal is contrary to policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in Supplementary Planning Document 4: The Design of Residential Extensions.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.