Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonCarshalton South & Clockhouse wardDM2024/00394
Planning application · Sutton

DM2024/00394.

25 Stanhope Road Carshalton SM5 4LH

Householder at 25 Stanhope Road Carshalton SM5 4LH, received 18 Mar 2024 — refused on 2 Jul 2024 (delegated, Ben Rochford).

SuttonCarshalton South & ClockhouseSM5 4LHDM2024/00394
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
2 Jul 2024
15 wks
Decision time
7 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
18
Documents
18 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey rear extension and provision of new boundary treatment.

Reference
DM2024/00394
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 4LH
Council
Received
18 Mar 2024
Validated
7 May 2024
Decision date
2 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2024/00394
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 4LH
Council
Received
18 Mar 2024
Validated
7 May 2024
Decision date
2 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
2 Jul 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
2 Jul 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
2 Jul 2024
Site Notice
7 Jun 2024
Site Notice
7 Jun 2024
A100 REV A
7 May 2024
LOCATION PLAN
29 Apr 2024
BLOCK PLAN
29 Apr 2024
B104A REV.A
29 Apr 2024
Application Form (No personal data)
18 Mar 2024
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
2 Jul 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
2 Jul 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
2 Jul 2024
Show all 10 rows
Site Notice
7 Jun 2024
Site Notice
7 Jun 2024
A100 REV A
7 May 2024
LOCATION PLAN
29 Apr 2024
BLOCK PLAN
29 Apr 2024
B104A REV.A
29 Apr 2024
Application Form (No personal data)
18 Mar 2024

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 2 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Ben Rochford — 15 weeks from submission (7 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Mar 2024
Application received
7 May 2024
Application validated
2 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford
18 Mar 2024
Application received
7 May 2024
Application validated
2 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, due to the extensions size, would appear excessive, disproportionately big, constricted within the plot and as an insubordinate addition and the proposal is therefore contrary to policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and 'Design of Residential Extensions' SPD4.
2
The proposed development, due to the size and close proximity of the extension to 26 Stanhope Road, would result in a loss of outlook to 26 Stanhope Road, appearing overbearing and creating a sense of enclosure. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and 'Design of Residential Extensions' SPD4.
1
The proposed development, due to the extensions size, would appear excessive, disproportionately big, constricted within the plot and as an insubordinate addition and the proposal is therefore contrary to policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and 'Design of Residential Extensions' SPD4.
2
The proposed development, due to the size and close proximity of the extension to 26 Stanhope Road, would result in a loss of outlook to 26 Stanhope Road, appearing overbearing and creating a sense of enclosure. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and 'Design of Residential Extensions' SPD4.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28Sutton Local Plan 29

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.