Planning application · Sutton
DM2024/00589.
1 Elgin Road Wallington SM6 8RE
Full / Other Planning at 1 Elgin Road Wallington SM6 8RE, received 25 Apr 2024 — refused on 2 Jul 2024 (delegated, Denuka Gunaratne).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
2 Jul 2024
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
48
Documents
48 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a detached single storey dwellinghouse with associated soft and hard landscaping and provision of refuse storage at the front.
Reference
DM2024/00589
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM6 8RE
Ward
Council
Received
25 Apr 2024
Validated
7 May 2024
Target date
2 Jul 2024
Decision date
2 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Reference
DM2024/00589
Type
Full Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM6 8RE
Ward
Council
Received
25 Apr 2024
Validated
7 May 2024
Target date
2 Jul 2024
Decision date
2 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 2 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Denuka Gunaratne — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
25 Apr 2024
Application received
7 May 2024
Application validated
2 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
2 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
25 Apr 2024
Application received
7 May 2024
Application validated
2 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
2 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development by reason of its detailed design and limited plot size would constitute an
incongruous and wholly inappropriate form of residential development inconsistent with the
prevailing pattern of development within the immediate area. In addition proposed development
which would be experienced as a single storey property would be uncharacteristic of the majority of
houses within the area which are two storey. As such the proposed dwelling would be harmful to
the character of the site and its wider setting and the streetscene contrary to Policies D1, D3, D4
and D6 of the London Plan 2021 and Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in
Supplementary Planning Document 14 'Creating Locally Distinctive Places'
1
The proposed development by reason of its detailed design and limited plot size would constitute an
incongruous and wholly inappropriate form of residential development inconsistent with the
prevailing pattern of development within the immediate area. In addition proposed development
which would be experienced as a single storey property would be uncharacteristic of the majority of
houses within the area which are two storey. As such the proposed dwelling would be harmful to
the character of the site and its wider setting and the streetscene contrary to Policies D1, D3, D4
and D6 of the London Plan 2021 and Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the advice in
Supplementary Planning Document 14 'Creating Locally Distinctive Places'
Policies cited
D1D3D4D6Sutton Local Plan 28
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.