Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonStonecot wardDM2024/00678
Planning application · Sutton

DM2024/00678.

61 Ash Road Sutton SM3 9LA

Householder at 61 Ash Road Sutton SM3 9LA, received 14 May 2024 — refused on 16 Jul 2024 (delegated, Emmanuel Agyei).

SuttonStonecotSM3 9LADM2024/00678
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Jul 2024
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
18
Documents
18 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a part one, part two storey front, side and rear extension, involving the conversion of garage into a habitable room, conversion of loft space involving alterations to existing roofline, a dormer extension at rear, rooflights to front roofslope and alterations to the front and rear fenestrations.

Reference
DM2024/00678
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM3 9LA
Council
Received
14 May 2024
Validated
23 May 2024
Target date
3 Jul 2024
Decision date
16 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2024/00678
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM3 9LA
Council
Received
14 May 2024
Validated
23 May 2024
Target date
3 Jul 2024
Decision date
16 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
16 Jul 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
16 Jul 2024
Site Notice
12 Jun 2024
DWG/10 REV 00
21 May 2024
DWG/07 REV 01
21 May 2024
DWG/09 REV 00
21 May 2024
Application Form (No personal data)
14 May 2024
DWG/05 Rev 00
14 May 2024
Heritage, Planning And Design And Access Statement
14 May 2024
DWG/01 Rev 00
14 May 2024
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
16 Jul 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
16 Jul 2024
Site Notice
12 Jun 2024
Show all 10 rows
DWG/10 REV 00
21 May 2024
DWG/07 REV 01
21 May 2024
DWG/09 REV 00
21 May 2024
Application Form (No personal data)
14 May 2024
DWG/05 Rev 00
14 May 2024
Heritage, Planning And Design And Access Statement
14 May 2024
DWG/01 Rev 00
14 May 2024

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 16 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Emmanuel Agyei — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
14 May 2024
Application received
23 May 2024
Application validated
3 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
16 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei
14 May 2024
Application received
23 May 2024
Application validated
3 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
16 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
By virtue of its design, scale and massing the proposed development would appear overdominant, incongruous and disproportionate to the host building and the adjoining property. The scheme therefore would be harmful to the site and its contribution to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy D4 of the London Plan, Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and SPD 4 'Design of Residential Extensions.
1
By virtue of its design, scale and massing the proposed development would appear overdominant, incongruous and disproportionate to the host building and the adjoining property. The scheme therefore would be harmful to the site and its contribution to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy D4 of the London Plan, Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and SPD 4 'Design of Residential Extensions.
Policies cited
D4Sutton Local Plan 28

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.