Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonSt Helier West wardDM2024/00934
Planning application · Sutton

DM2024/00934.

50 Rosehill Avenue Sutton SM1 3HG

Householder at 50 Rosehill Avenue Sutton SM1 3HG, received 5 Jul 2024 — refused on 2 Sep 2024 (delegated, Ben Rochford).

SuttonSt Helier WestSM1 3HGDM2024/00934
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
2 Sep 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
27
Documents
27 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of part one, part two storey side and rear extension including conversion of garage into habitable space. Conversion of loft space involving alterations to existing roofline, including a hip to gable roof and dormer extension at rear and rooflights to front and rear roofslopes.

Reference
DM2024/00934
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 3HG
Council
Received
5 Jul 2024
Validated
15 Jul 2024
Target date
9 Sep 2024
Decision date
2 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2024/00934
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 3HG
Council
Received
5 Jul 2024
Validated
15 Jul 2024
Target date
9 Sep 2024
Decision date
2 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal Decision
23 Apr 2025
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
2 Sept 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
2 Sept 2024
Site Notice
25 Jul 2024
Fire Safety Strategy (Part A) - Reasonable Exception Form (1
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-007 REV00
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-008 Rev00
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-108 Rev00
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-109 Rev00
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-201 Rev01
15 Jul 2024
Appeal Decision
23 Apr 2025
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
2 Sept 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
2 Sept 2024
Show all 10 rows
Site Notice
25 Jul 2024
Fire Safety Strategy (Part A) - Reasonable Exception Form (1
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-007 REV00
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-008 Rev00
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-108 Rev00
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-109 Rev00
15 Jul 2024
PC-SM13HG-DWG-201 Rev01
15 Jul 2024

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 2 Sep 2024, delegated decision by Ben Rochford — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Jul 2024
Application received
15 Jul 2024
Application validated
9 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
2 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
5 Jul 2024
Application received
15 Jul 2024
Application validated
9 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
2 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extensions, due to their size, bulk and mass, would appear excessive, disproportionate, overly dominant and as an overdevelopment of the plot and it is considered that the design of the proposal is unacceptable and would cause harm to the character of the streetscene and wider area contrary to policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and 'Design of Residential Extensions' SPD4.
1
The proposed extensions, due to their size, bulk and mass, would appear excessive, disproportionate, overly dominant and as an overdevelopment of the plot and it is considered that the design of the proposal is unacceptable and would cause harm to the character of the streetscene and wider area contrary to policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and 'Design of Residential Extensions' SPD4.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.