Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonWorcester Park South wardDM2024/00943
Planning application · Sutton

DM2024/00943.

139 Stoneleigh Avenue Worcester Park KT4 8XZ

Householder at 139 Stoneleigh Avenue Worcester Park KT4 8XZ, received 8 Jul 2024 — refused on 20 Sep 2024 (delegated, Emmanuel Agyei).

SuttonWorcester Park SouthKT4 8XZDM2024/00943
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Sep 2024
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a first floor rear extension and alterations to the first floor rear fenestration.

Reference
DM2024/00943
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT4 8XZ
Council
Received
8 Jul 2024
Validated
30 Jul 2024
Target date
24 Sep 2024
Decision date
20 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2024/00943
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT4 8XZ
Council
Received
8 Jul 2024
Validated
30 Jul 2024
Target date
24 Sep 2024
Decision date
20 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
20 Sept 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
20 Sept 2024
Site Notice
13 Aug 2024
139-STA-11PP
30 Jul 2024
139-STA-14PP
30 Jul 2024
139-STA-13PP
30 Jul 2024
139-STA-10PP
18 Jul 2024
139-STA-12PP
18 Jul 2024
FIRE SAFETY STRATEGY REASONABLE EXCEPTION STATEMENT
16 Jul 2024
LOCATION PLAN
16 Jul 2024
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
20 Sept 2024
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
20 Sept 2024
Site Notice
13 Aug 2024
Show all 10 rows
139-STA-11PP
30 Jul 2024
139-STA-14PP
30 Jul 2024
139-STA-13PP
30 Jul 2024
139-STA-10PP
18 Jul 2024
139-STA-12PP
18 Jul 2024
FIRE SAFETY STRATEGY REASONABLE EXCEPTION STATEMENT
16 Jul 2024
LOCATION PLAN
16 Jul 2024

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 Sep 2024, delegated decision by Emmanuel Agyei — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Jul 2024
Application received
30 Jul 2024
Application validated
24 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
20 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei
8 Jul 2024
Application received
30 Jul 2024
Application validated
24 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, siting and design in addition to the previous extension at the site would be unduly prominent within the context to the detriment of the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the surrounding area. The proposal would fail to read as a subordinate addition to the main dwelling and would therefore be contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the Supplementary Planning Document 4 'Design of Residential Extensions'.
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, siting and design in addition to the previous extension at the site would be unduly prominent within the context to the detriment of the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the surrounding area. The proposal would fail to read as a subordinate addition to the main dwelling and would therefore be contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the Supplementary Planning Document 4 'Design of Residential Extensions'.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.