Planning application · Sutton
DM2024/01364.
60 Waverley Avenue Sutton SM1 3JY
Full / Other Planning at 60 Waverley Avenue Sutton SM1 3JY, received 25 Sep 2024 — refused on 14 Nov 2024 (delegated, Lauren Liu).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Nov 2024
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
24
Documents
24 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of the garage and outbuilding. Erection of a two storey 3-bedroomed dwelling with parking to the front, a raised patio and steps to the rear. Provision of refuse and cycle storage to the side and associated boundary treatments.
Reference
DM2024/01364
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 3JY
Ward
Council
Received
25 Sep 2024
Target date
20 Nov 2024
Decision date
14 Nov 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Reference
DM2024/01364
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM1 3JY
Ward
Council
Received
25 Sep 2024
Target date
20 Nov 2024
Decision date
14 Nov 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 14 Nov 2024, delegated decision by Lauren Liu — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
25 Sep 2024
Application received
20 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
14 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Lauren Liu
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
25 Sep 2024
Application received
20 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
14 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Lauren Liu
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of siting within a subdivided plot, would unduly interrupt the
prevailing pattern of development in terms of its urban grain and would also fail to integrate
positively into the street scene and would appear cramped within its setting contrary to the character
and appearance of the street scene and surrounding area. The development is therefore contrary to
Policies 7, 9 and 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
2
Without evidence to the contrary, the proposed development, by reason of loss of off-street parking
to the host dwelling (60 Waverley Avenue), would result in overspill parking onto surrounding roads
to the detriment of on-street parking provision within the surrounding roads contrary to Policies 36
and 37 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
3
The proposed development, by reason of lack of vehicular entry in and out of the site in forward
gear, would introduce unsafe vehicular access arrangements for future occupiers and would result in
harm to highway safety for vehicular users and pedestrians contrary to Policies 36 and 37 of the
Sutton Local Plan 2018.
4
Insufficient evidence has been submitted to demonstrate how the proposed development will meet
the sustainable drainage requirements to minimise flood risk contrary to Policy 32 of the Sutton
Local Plan 2018.
5
Insufficient evidence has been submitted to demonstrate the development can achieve Biodiversity
Net Gain contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework, Schedule 7A of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990 (as inserted by Schedule 14 of the Environment Act 2021) and Policy 26 of the
Sutton Local Plan 2018.
1
The proposed development, by reason of siting within a subdivided plot, would unduly interrupt the
prevailing pattern of development in terms of its urban grain and would also fail to integrate
positively into the street scene and would appear cramped within its setting contrary to the character
and appearance of the street scene and surrounding area. The development is therefore contrary to
Policies 7, 9 and 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
2
Without evidence to the contrary, the proposed development, by reason of loss of off-street parking
to the host dwelling (60 Waverley Avenue), would result in overspill parking onto surrounding roads
to the detriment of on-street parking provision within the surrounding roads contrary to Policies 36
and 37 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
3
The proposed development, by reason of lack of vehicular entry in and out of the site in forward
gear, would introduce unsafe vehicular access arrangements for future occupiers and would result in
harm to highway safety for vehicular users and pedestrians contrary to Policies 36 and 37 of the
Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Show all 5 rows
4
Insufficient evidence has been submitted to demonstrate how the proposed development will meet
the sustainable drainage requirements to minimise flood risk contrary to Policy 32 of the Sutton
Local Plan 2018.
5
Insufficient evidence has been submitted to demonstrate the development can achieve Biodiversity
Net Gain contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework, Schedule 7A of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990 (as inserted by Schedule 14 of the Environment Act 2021) and Policy 26 of the
Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 7Sutton Local Plan 9Sutton Local Plan 28Sutton Local Plan 36Sutton Local Plan 37Sutton Local Plan 32Sutton Local Plan 26NPPF
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal Dismissed
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.