Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonCarshalton South & Clockhouse wardDM2025/00630
Planning application · Sutton

DM2025/00630.

12 Oaks Track Little Woodcote Estate Carshalton SM5 4AP

Householder at 12 Oaks Track Little Woodcote Estate Carshalton SM5 4AP, received 9 May 2025 — refused on 23 Jul 2025 (delegated, Denuka Gunaratne).

SuttonCarshalton South & ClockhouseSM5 4APDM2025/00630
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Jul 2025
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a part one, part two storey front, side and rear extension including the formation of a front entrance porch, alterations to main roof including the installation of a rooflight to rear roofslope and alteration to the ground floor front fenestration.

Reference
DM2025/00630
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 4AP
Council
Received
9 May 2025
Validated
28 May 2025
Target date
22 Jul 2025
Decision date
23 Jul 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2025/00630
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM5 4AP
Council
Received
9 May 2025
Validated
28 May 2025
Target date
22 Jul 2025
Decision date
23 Jul 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
23 Jul 2025
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
23 Jul 2025
Site Notice
2 Jul 2025
Site Notice
2 Jul 2025
SURREY COUNTY
16 Jun 2025
200
28 May 2025
700
28 May 2025
101
28 May 2025
Application Form (No personal data)
9 May 2025
Fire Safety Strategy Reasonable Exception Statement
9 May 2025
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
23 Jul 2025
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
23 Jul 2025
Site Notice
2 Jul 2025
Show all 10 rows
Site Notice
2 Jul 2025
SURREY COUNTY
16 Jun 2025
200
28 May 2025
700
28 May 2025
101
28 May 2025
Application Form (No personal data)
9 May 2025
Fire Safety Strategy Reasonable Exception Statement
9 May 2025

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 23 Jul 2025, delegated decision by Denuka Gunaratne — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
9 May 2025
Application received
28 May 2025
Application validated
22 Jul 2025
Statutory target date
23 Jul 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne
9 May 2025
Application received
28 May 2025
Application validated
22 Jul 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
23 Jul 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Denuka Gunaratne

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extensions would be an overdevelopment of the host dwelling by introducing an unacceptable increase in volume to the original dwelling resulting in harm to the openness of the Green Belt contrary to Policy 24 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
1
The proposed extensions would be an overdevelopment of the host dwelling by introducing an unacceptable increase in volume to the original dwelling resulting in harm to the openness of the Green Belt contrary to Policy 24 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 24

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.