Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonWallington North wardDM2025/01088
Planning application · Sutton

DM2025/01088.

Arc Apartments 98-100 Manor Road Wallington SM6 0ED

Full / Other Planning at Arc Apartments 98-100 Manor Road Wallington SM6 0ED, received 19 Aug 2025 — refused on 14 Oct 2025 (delegated, Ben Rochford).

SuttonWallington NorthSM6 0EDDM2025/01088
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Oct 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
34
Documents
34 linked
13
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a fourth floor extension to provide two additional self contained residential units and provision of a communal terrace at roof level.

Reference
DM2025/01088
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM6 0ED
Council
Received
19 Aug 2025
Target date
19 Sep 2025
Decision date
14 Oct 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2025/01088
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM6 0ED
Council
Received
19 Aug 2025
Target date
19 Sep 2025
Decision date
14 Oct 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL
14 Oct 2025
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
14 Oct 2025
OFFICER REPORT
14 Oct 2025
MX POLLUTION CONTROL
17 Sept 2025
MR JIFU ZUO
9 Sept 2025
MR PATRICK WHITTER
8 Sept 2025
2
2 Sept 2025
1
2 Sept 2025
Application Form (No personal data)
19 Aug 2025
1600.PL.1001
19 Aug 2025
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED FUL
14 Oct 2025
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
14 Oct 2025
OFFICER REPORT
14 Oct 2025
Show all 10 rows
MX POLLUTION CONTROL
17 Sept 2025
MR JIFU ZUO
9 Sept 2025
MR PATRICK WHITTER
8 Sept 2025
2
2 Sept 2025
1
2 Sept 2025
Application Form (No personal data)
19 Aug 2025
1600.PL.1001
19 Aug 2025

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 14 Oct 2025, delegated decision by Ben Rochford — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Aug 2025
Application received
19 Sep 2025
Statutory target date
14 Oct 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford
19 Aug 2025
Application received
19 Sep 2025
Statutory target date
14 Oct 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Ben Rochford

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its excessive height, bulk and massing, particularly on the southern elevation where there is no setback together with the utilitarian appearance of the lift extension, would appear visually intrusive, overly dominant, stark and would detract from the architectural coherence of the existing building, introducing an overbearing form that would appear harsh and unrelieved when viewed from adjacent properties and public viewpoints. The proposal would therefore result in an unsympathetic form of development contrary to policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021 and policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
1
The proposed development, by reason of its excessive height, bulk and massing, particularly on the southern elevation where there is no setback together with the utilitarian appearance of the lift extension, would appear visually intrusive, overly dominant, stark and would detract from the architectural coherence of the existing building, introducing an overbearing form that would appear harsh and unrelieved when viewed from adjacent properties and public viewpoints. The proposal would therefore result in an unsympathetic form of development contrary to policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021 and policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018.
Policies cited
D3D4Sutton Local Plan 28

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
13
In support
0
Total comments
13
Objections
13
In support
0
Total comments
13
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.