Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonBelmont wardDM2026/00144
Planning application · Sutton

DM2026/00144.

80 Banstead Road South Sutton SM2 5LH

Householder at 80 Banstead Road South Sutton SM2 5LH, received 5 Feb 2026 — refused on 31 Mar 2026 (delegated, Emmanuel Agyei).

SuttonBelmontSM2 5LHDM2026/00144
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
31 Mar 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
2
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey rear extension, extension to the front entrance porch, conversion of garage into habitable rooms and alteration to the ground floor front fenestration.

Reference
DM2026/00144
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM2 5LH
Council
Received
5 Feb 2026
Target date
10 Mar 2026
Decision date
31 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2026/00144
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SM2 5LH
Council
Received
5 Feb 2026
Target date
10 Mar 2026
Decision date
31 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
31 Mar 2026
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
31 Mar 2026
Site Notice
26 Feb 2026
Application Form (No personal data)
5 Feb 2026
SA/SM2/AR/02 Rev 0
5 Feb 2026
SA/SM2/AR/01 Rev 0
5 Feb 2026
SA/SM2/AR/03 Rev 0
5 Feb 2026
Fire Safety Strategy Reasonable Exception Statement
5 Feb 2026
Location Plan
5 Feb 2026
SA/SM2/AR/09 Rev 0
5 Feb 2026
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
31 Mar 2026
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
31 Mar 2026
Site Notice
26 Feb 2026
Show all 10 rows
Application Form (No personal data)
5 Feb 2026
SA/SM2/AR/02 Rev 0
5 Feb 2026
SA/SM2/AR/01 Rev 0
5 Feb 2026
SA/SM2/AR/03 Rev 0
5 Feb 2026
Fire Safety Strategy Reasonable Exception Statement
5 Feb 2026
Location Plan
5 Feb 2026
SA/SM2/AR/09 Rev 0
5 Feb 2026

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 31 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Emmanuel Agyei — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Feb 2026
Application received
10 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
31 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei
5 Feb 2026
Application received
10 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
31 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, particularly the single storey rear extension element would by reason of its excessive depth and proximity to the shared southern boundary line would result in an adverse impact on the occupiers of 82 Banstead Road in terms of loss of light, loss of outlook and sense of enclosure. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to Policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and guidance set out in SPD4 'Design of Residential Extensions'.
1
The proposed development, particularly the single storey rear extension element would by reason of its excessive depth and proximity to the shared southern boundary line would result in an adverse impact on the occupiers of 82 Banstead Road in terms of loss of light, loss of outlook and sense of enclosure. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to Policy 29 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and guidance set out in SPD4 'Design of Residential Extensions'.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 29

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.