Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasSuttonNorth Cheam wardDM2026/00406
Planning application · Sutton

DM2026/00406.

28 Andrews Close Worcester Park KT4 8PF

Householder at 28 Andrews Close Worcester Park KT4 8PF, received 30 Mar 2026 — refused on 20 May 2026 (delegated, Emmanuel Agyei).

SuttonNorth CheamKT4 8PFDM2026/00406
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationSutton profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 May 2026
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Sutton planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single storey front extension.

Reference
DM2026/00406
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT4 8PF
Council
Received
30 Mar 2026
Validated
1 Apr 2026
Target date
12 May 2026
Decision date
20 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Reference
DM2026/00406
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
KT4 8PF
Council
Received
30 Mar 2026
Validated
1 Apr 2026
Target date
12 May 2026
Decision date
20 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
20 May 2026
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
20 May 2026
Site Notice
24 Apr 2026
Site Notice
24 Apr 2026
4240/01-1A
7 Apr 2026
4240/01-2A
7 Apr 2026
4240/01-3
7 Apr 2026
4240/01-4A
7 Apr 2026
4240/01-5
7 Apr 2026
4240/02-1
7 Apr 2026
DECISION NOTICE REFUSED HHA
20 May 2026
HOUSEHOLDER REPORT
20 May 2026
Site Notice
24 Apr 2026
Show all 10 rows
Site Notice
24 Apr 2026
4240/01-1A
7 Apr 2026
4240/01-2A
7 Apr 2026
4240/01-3
7 Apr 2026
4240/01-4A
7 Apr 2026
4240/01-5
7 Apr 2026
4240/02-1
7 Apr 2026

Documents open on the Sutton portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 May 2026, delegated decision by Emmanuel Agyei — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Mar 2026
Application received
1 Apr 2026
Application validated
12 May 2026
Statutory target date
20 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei
30 Mar 2026
Application received
1 Apr 2026
Application validated
12 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Emmanuel Agyei

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Given its excessive depth, width and location on the principal elevation, the proposed single storey front extension would appear as an overly dominant and incongruous feature to the detriment of the character and appearance of the host property, the row of terrace, and the surrounding area. The proposal would therefore be contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the guidance contained in SPD 4 'Design of Residential Extensions' and SPD 14 'Creating Locally Distinctive Places'.
1
Given its excessive depth, width and location on the principal elevation, the proposed single storey front extension would appear as an overly dominant and incongruous feature to the detriment of the character and appearance of the host property, the row of terrace, and the surrounding area. The proposal would therefore be contrary to Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 and the guidance contained in SPD 4 'Design of Residential Extensions' and SPD 14 'Creating Locally Distinctive Places'.
Policies cited
Sutton Local Plan 28

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.