Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsWhitechapel ward09/02533
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

09/02533.

Site At 261 To 267 Commercial Road 3 To 15 Cavell Street And 84 To 88 Nelson Street, Commercial Road, London

Non-Material Amendment at Site At 261 To 267 Commercial Road 3 To 15 Cavell Street And 84 To 88 Nelson Street, Commercial Road, London — permit on 15 Feb 2010 (delegated, Ila Robertson).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Permit
Outcome
15 Feb 2010
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Non-material amendment to proposal for 'In outline, construction of a building ranging from five to seven storeys for re-development as a hotel of approximately 130 rooms with a restaurant, conference rooms and basement level' granted planning permission on 10th April 2008, reference PA/06/1010. Ame

Reference
09/02533
Type
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Applicant
Case officer
Received
Validated
15 Dec 2009
Decision date
15 Feb 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
09/02533
Type
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Show all 12 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Received
Validated
15 Dec 2009
Decision date
15 Feb 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Decision

What happened?

Permit on 15 Feb 2010, delegated decision by Ila Robertson.

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Dec 2009
Application validated
15 Feb 2010
Delegated decision: Permit · Ila Robertson
15 Dec 2009
Application validated
15 Feb 2010
Delegated decision: Permit · Ila Robertson

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.