Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasTower HamletsWhitechapel ward14/00935/S
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

14/00935/S.

89 Myrdle Street, London, E1 1HL

Discharge of Conditions at 89 Myrdle Street, London, E1 1HL — permit on 9 Sep 2014 (delegated, Killian Harrington).

Tower HamletsWhitechapel14/00935/S
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Permit
Outcome
9 Sep 2014
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Submission of details pursuant to condition no. 3 (Material Samples & Roof Details) and 4 (Screening details) of planning permission dated 08/06/2010, ref: PA/10/00654.

Reference
14/00935/S
Type
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
22 May 2014
Decision date
9 Sep 2014
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
14/00935/S
Type
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Show all 13 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Received
Validated
22 May 2014
Decision date
9 Sep 2014
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Permit on 9 Sep 2014, delegated decision by Killian Harrington.

Timeline

Date
Event
22 May 2014
Application validated
9 Sep 2014
Delegated decision: Permit · Killian Harrington
22 May 2014
Application validated
9 Sep 2014
Delegated decision: Permit · Killian Harrington

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.