Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Tower Hamlets›…Blackwall and Cubitt Town ward›15/00015/NC
Planning application · Tower Hamlets

15/00015/NC.

Building C, New Providence Wharf, Blackwall Way, London

Non-Material Amendment at Building C, New Providence Wharf, Blackwall Way, London — permit on 28 Jan 2015 (delegated, Kirsty Gilmer).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationTower Hamlets profile →
Permit
Outcome
28 Jan 2015
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Tower Hamlets planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Application for non-material amendment to planning permission Ref: PA/13/01953, Dated 10/11/2014. Non Material Amendments Sought:Amendment to condition no. 7 (Landscaping) & 25 (drawings)Deletion of Condition no. 21(Vibration)

Reference
15/00015/NC
Type
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
6 Jan 2015
Decision date
28 Jan 2015
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Reference
15/00015/NC
Type
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Site
Show all 13 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
6 Jan 2015
Decision date
28 Jan 2015
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Tower Hamlets portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Permit on 28 Jan 2015, delegated decision by Kirsty Gilmer.

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Jan 2015
Application validated
28 Jan 2015
Delegated decision: Permit · Kirsty Gilmer
6 Jan 2015
Application validated
28 Jan 2015
Delegated decision: Permit · Kirsty Gilmer

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.